Difference Between Consensus and Majority Rule (With Table)

The decision-making process is carried out to reach a conclusion by different methods. When a group discussion takes place, this decision-making process helps in coming up with a decision efficiently and quickly, although they have their pros and cons. Consensus and Majority rule are some of the decision-making processes. They are very different from each other not only in the process as well in its basics. Both are used according to the situation. 

Consensus vs Majority Rule 

The main difference between consensus and majority rule is that consensus needs a group to agree collectively. Meanwhile, majority rule comes up to a conclusion by a decision of the majority. The consensus rules out everyone’s participation, while the majority rule excludes minority decisions agreeing with the majority decision. 

Consensus needs the participation of everyone during the decision-making process. And for the decision, everyone needs to come up to an agreement collectively rather than being in different groups. Besides, the environment is indeed healthier as there should be collective agreement. Thus, communication must be subtle. In addition to that, collective decision-making makes it longer to come up to a conclusion. Lastly, minority opinionated people may fall into groupthink in consensus. 

The majority rule is the fastest decision-making process as it doesn’t require a collective agreement. Thus, the majority rule out the minority in this case. To an extent, the minority may express an opinion, but only the majority’s decision is taken into consideration. The majority rule allows it to choose its decision irrespective of the final majority decision. And, it can be burdening for minorities as the majority can be oppressive as well. 

Comparison Table Between Consensus and Majority Rule 

Parameters of Comparison 


Majority Rule 


Consensus needs collective agreement for the final decision. 

The majority rule relies on the majority’s opinion. 


Consensus addresses both sides. 

In majority rule, only majority opinions are understood. 


Consensus comes to a middle ground if there’s a disagreement.

In majority rule, the majority’s opinion rules out the minority’s opinion.


Consensus takes a longer time for decision-making. 

The majority rule quickly comes to a decision.

Minority Rights

In consensus, minority opinion leads to disagreement implying the rights of minorities.

There are no rights for minorities in majority rule. 

What is Consensus? 

Consensus is a decision-making process that requires a collective agreement to rule out a decision. Both opinions are heard and understood then a solution comes up that respects both sides and comes to a mutual negotiation. 

Moreover, it cannot be considered as a majority decision nor unanimity. Every person has a choice to choose their opinion. However, to come up to a consensus a collective agreement is a must. ‘Consent’ is the basis of consensus. Therefore if any side disagrees, there is still a requirement to get overall consent to achieve an agreement that respects both opinions. For issue need to be settled, cooperation between both sides is necessary. 

Consensus is neither a majority rule nor a unanimity as consensus relies on collective agreement. Every single opinion matters in this type of decision-making. Although it addresses every disagreement, yet it may not fully fit in the decision. If more than 51% of people prefer an option, even though it may not come to a consensus as it’s not enough. 

A consensus is hard to come up with, as there’s no middle option, although the middle option could be insufficient. But, coming to how a consensus can be reached if every argument is understood, then deducing to come up to a common ground and find the best solution from it. Hence, consensus can come through a collective agreement. 

What is Majority Rule? 

Majority rule is also a decision-making process that rules out minority opinions. Every person has an opportunity to choose their view freely without regarding the formation of either majority or minority. It is a binary decision. If an opinion gets more than half agreement, then that opinion rules out the minority opinion. It is commonly achieved in the most influential decision-making bodies.  

According to Kenneth May, the majority rule is considered reasonable because it endorses fairness, anonymity, neutrality, decisiveness, monotonicity. Furthermore, every vote counts as identical. Therefore it doesn’t matter who casts a vote. And decisions are made quickly in contrast to consensus. 

Moreover, the collective agreement can be cyclic, yet majority rule relies on the choice to change their opinion. So, there is a possibility of a change of decision every time. The majority rule is very vulnerable as there’s a possibility that a shift in opinion can turn the tables. 

As for the limitations, the minority rights are subsidiary as the majority has the most power in every aspect. The majority can move to the tyranny of majority rule by putting minorities back without any rights. Secondly, it can lead to imprecise priorities because the majority group may consider what they think is essential rather than significant priorities. Last;y, it may be recognized as an arrogant culture and conflict due to leaning at one side. 

Main Differences Between Consensus and Majority Rule 

The decision-making process can be nerve-wracking and stressful yet necessary. There are different methods for decision-making, such as consensus and majority rule. Each type has its pros and cons. Consensus and majority rule are some of the decision-making processes that are commonly used. Both are very different from each other ranging from participation to final decision. 

  1. Consensus requires collective agreement, including minority, while majority rule focuses on majority opinion for final decision. 
  2. Consensus addresses both sides. Meanwhile, majority rule revolves around the majority only. 
  3. Consensus comes up to a common ground if there is a disagreement, while in majority rule, the minority opinion prevails from the majority. 
  4. Consensus takes a longer time to agree. Meanwhile, majority rule is fast in decision-making. 
  5. In consensus, minority opinion leads to disagreement implying the rights of minorities, while in majority rule, the minority has no rights. 


The Decision-making process is adopted for fair decisions by many organizations and authorization. Although, it can be very stressful. Sometimes, the decision-making process may seem aggressive. Thus, it is portrayed as an aggressive culture and conflict. To make it more fair and equal, many functions and rights are included in it. Some of the decision-making processes are consensus and majority rule. 

Consensus requires the participation of every member for a collective agreement to come up to a decision. Although, if there’s a disagreement, then that issue needs to be resolved to come to a resolution. Every conflict is addressed, yet it may not fit in the final decision. Indeed, the environment is much healthier than in other decision-making processes. It takes a longer time to come up with a decision. Also, minority opinionated members may fall into groupthink in consensus. 

The majority rule does require the participation of all, but the majority rules out the minority in the final decision. Even the minority opinions are addressed, yet the final result is only affected by the majority’s opinion.  This decision-making process can be burdening and stressful for minorities as they’re not heard. Also, they have no rights as well.  


  1. https://journals.aps.org/pre/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevE.103.L060301
  2. https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/polsci_books/1/