Difference Between Vivo and Vitro (With Table)

Many types of industry are found in the modern economy. Economics is a very complex term to elaborate on. There are countless organizations, companies, institutions, etc. Some have the potential to power the economy effectively. Vivo and Vitro are two major companies. They produce essential products useful in our daily life.

Vivo vs Vitro

The main difference between Vivo and Vitro is that Vivo is a Chinese company that makes smartphones while Vitro is a Mexican company that is related to the glass industry. Both are well-known names in their respective fields. Eight out of ten people have used the products made by these companies.

Vivo is a major company in the field of communication technology. It belongs to China and its headquarter is in a Chinese reign, Dongguan. It develops smartphone and smartphone accessories and uses V-Appstore to distribute its services. No country would have been untouched by the influence of Vivo.

Vitro is a major company in the field of the glass industry. It belongs to Mexico and its headquarters is in Mexican reign San Paulo Garza Garcia. It develops glass, chemicals, automotive glass, etc. It provides its services in many countries as well. It is quite older than Vivo. Vitro has completed a century in the industry.

Comparison Table Between Vivo and Vitro

Parameters Of Comparison




Vivo was founded by Shen Wei twelve years ago in 2009.

Vitro was founded by Roberto G. Sada Garcia in 1909.


The industry Vivo serves is communication technology.

The industry Vitro serves is the Glass industry.

Area served




The headquarter of Vivo is in Dongguan, China.

The headquarter of Vitro is in San Paulo Garza Garcia, Mexico.

Number of employees

Vivo has around 10,000 employees.

Vitro has almost 15,000 employees.

What is Vivo?

The full name of Vivo is Vivo Communication Technology Co. Ltd. It is a Chinese technology company. Vivo develops and designs smartphones, smartphone accessories, software, HiFi, and other online services.

It has its app store known as V-Appstore. This helps Vivo to distribute its software and online services across many countries. Vivo is an independent company and is known to develop and make its products. The headquarters of Vivo is in Dongguan.

It has multiple research centers in many cities like Shenzhen, Nanjing, Guangdong, etc. Vivo is a dominant company in the industry of consumer electronics. Shen Wei founded Vivo Communication Technology Co. Ltd twelve years ago, in 2009.

The area served by Vivo is worldwide. Key people of Vivo are Shen Wei who’s the CEO of the company and Jerome Chen who is CMO & VP of Vivo India. Vivo launched a brand in 2019 known as iQOO. The parent company of Vivo is BBK Electronics.

It is a subsidiary of BBK Electronics. Vivo has accomplished a significant position in the communication industry. In 2015, Vivo ranked among the top 10 smartphone-making companies. The major factor of this ranking was 2.7% global market share. Vivo has over two hundred million users around the world.

Notable innovations by Vivo are adding fingerprint readers right beneath the screen; it has removed the bottom bezel to make more room for the screen, also added an audio chip of HiFi quality and a 2k thinnest screen.

What is Vitro?

Vitro is the largest company in Mexico that produces glass. It is also the largest organization in the glass industry. Vitro was founded at Monterey in 1909, in Mexico. It has been very innovative in the field of the glass industry.

This organization is so large that it has 30 subsidiaries in Panama, Costa Rica, Mexico, Colombia, Bolivia, the United States, and Brazil. The headquarters of Vitro is in San Paulo Garza Garcia, Mexico. The founder of Vitro is Roberto G. Sada Garcia.

There are multiple other branches of this company. Some of these are LLC, Vitro Architectural Glass, S.A. De C.V., Vitro Packaging, etc. Key people of Vitro are Adrian G. Sada González who is chairman of the company and Adrian G. Sada Cueva who is CEO of the company.

By the passing of time Vitro has expanded its area of production where it does not only produce glass but also some other products that are chemicals, Glass containers, Automotive Glass, Float Glass, etc. Vitro serves in 34 countries of Asia, Europe, and America by providing glass articles.

Vitro is now focused on producing flat glass. The number of employees in Vitro is 15,035. The capital stock that Vitro controls in the companies held by it, directly or indirectly, is more than 50%. In some companies, Vitro has joint control and to execute this control, Vitro uses the proportionate consolidation method.

Main Differences Between Vivo and Vitro

  1. Vivo is an Asian company located in the region of China while vitro is an American company located in the region of Mexico.
  2. The industry served by Vivo is telecommunication. On the other hand, vitro has served the glass industry for a long time.
  3. A large number of countries served by Vivo are in Asia itself while Vivo serves evenly in four continents.
  4. The products provided by Vivo are related to electronic technology while Vitro makes different kinds of glasses.
  5. Vivo has completed only a decade in the industry while Vitro has been around for an entire century.


Both Vivo and Vitro have been around for a long time. The area of service is different from each other. Both have contributed significantly to the economy of their respective countries and provided services to the millions of people of different countries.

Both companies have seen good and bad times. There has been a lot of controversy regarding both Vivo and Vitro. But they struggled and still, they are still giving competition to their competitors. It takes a very long pipeline of methods and policies to run a large organization or company and both Vivo and Vitro have proved their persistence.

Vitro shows dedication by remaining in the field for that long while Vivo shows hard work by achieving so many goals within a short time.No country can be powerful without a strong economy in order to compete with other countries. And both these companies have the potential to serve their respective countries to achieve those goals.


  1. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ana.410160409
  2. https://www.nature.com/articles/288551a0